Awake Foundation / Insurance Transparency Reform
Proposed — not current law

Colorado Model Amendments

Preserve the successful core of §10-3-1117, then add a reasonable-search standard, insured enforcement, a Coverage Search Record, UM/UIM transmission, and release integrity.

MODEL / PROPOSED. This is policy architecture for legislative drafting, not the text of current C.R.S. §10-3-1117 and not final bill language.

Amendment 1 — Define “reasonable coverage inquiry”

Require each responding insurer to search records reasonably associated with the insured identity and claim for personal/commercial automobile and any umbrella/excess products the insurer writes or administers that could respond. The statute should specify that the duty is reasonable, not limitless.

Amendment 2 — Require a Coverage Search Record

Along with responsive policies, provide a short standardized record identifying the insured/entity searched, product lines searched, responsive policy numbers/form identifiers, additional carrier leads identified in the claim file, and the reviewer/date. No claim diary or privileged legal advice is required.

Amendment 3 — Strengthen the insured duty

Add an express response period for the insured's §10-3-1117(2)(b) duty and a cure-and-enforcement mechanism. Permit the insured to respond through counsel or insurer, but do not allow the duty to disappear simply because representation exists.

Amendment 4 — Owner/employer branch

When a claimant provides a reasonable factual basis that another vehicle owner or employer may have liability coverage, require that person/entity to identify known potentially responsive insurers and brokers. The duty does not concede course and scope or coverage.

Amendment 5 — UM/UIM interoperability

At the claimant's written direction, permit the standardized record to be transmitted directly to the claimant's UM/UIM carrier. Preserve all policy-based notice requirements and claimant rights.

Amendment 6 — Release integrity

Require a motor-vehicle liability release tendered with a policy-limit payment to identify the released insureds and coverage layer. Unknown or specifically unresolved employer/business/owner coverage should not be deemed released by generic language unless the claimant knowingly and expressly agrees.

Amendment 7 — Privacy and use

Permit redaction of premium/payment data and unrelated personal identifiers. Permit use of core coverage information for claim evaluation, professional advice, UM/UIM presentation, enforcement, and litigation concerning the claim. Preserve appropriate limits on public dissemination.

Amendment 8 — Proportionate enforcement

Retain meaningful consequences for noncompliance while adding a short cure process for immaterial clerical defects. Knowing or materially false certification should receive stronger treatment than a promptly corrected omission.

Success metric

A successful Colorado reform should make it possible for a claimant to answer, before filing suit: What insurance may respond? What branches were searched? What remains genuinely disputed? Is litigation proportionate?

Primary authorities

Authorities checked September 2026. Court rules and statutes can change; verify the current text before relying on a procedural deadline.